The bumbling and forgetful Alzheimer-in-Chief is advocating a “temporary ceasefire” and threatening to ram hostage and diplomatic deals down Israel’s throat

President Joe Biden’s latest demand for a “temporary ceasefire” in Gaza, submitted now as a UN draft resolution, aims ostensibly at securing the release of hostages, has ignited a firestorm of criticism in Israel and among its supporters.

Make no mistake: Biden, who can’t even remember the name of Israel’s enemy, is revealing his intent to ram a ceasefire solution down Israel’s throat, leaving Hamas undefeated. It is a crass betrayal of the US-Israel alliance, revealing the moral and stategic weakness of an American Administaton with a cognitively-challenged puppet President as its help, evidently operated by remote control by Obama and his swamp agents.

This call and the draft resolution at the UN is transparently a cynical maneuver to override Israel’s military objectives and impose a resolution that might compromise its national security, preventing a planned offensive into the remaining Hamas stronghold of Rafah. It is an attempt by the Biden administration to sideline Israel in critical security decisions, potentially “snatching defeat from the jaws of victory” in its fight against Hamas. Why? Because an Israeli victory will not allow the world to force Israel to accept a diktat of accepting a terror state on its doorstep, conrolling its capital, holy places, and undoing its sovereignty.

The way Biden is operating is double-dealing, asserting that the US has the authority to operate unilaterally, against Israel’s will and counter to its war aims, because some of the Israeli hostages, including senior citizens and soldier, have US citizenship as well.

“There has to be a temporary ceasefire to get the prisoners out—to get the hostages out,” Biden declared, suddenly emphasizing the presence of American hostages as a key rationale. This emphasis on American lives has raised suspicions that it could be used as leverage to coerce Israel into compliance with U.S. dictates, potentially at the expense of its broader security goals.

The insistence on prioritizing a diplomatic solution for the hostage situation, especially before allowing Israel to proceed with its planned military operation in Rafah, hints at an underlying agenda. Critics suggest that by foregrounding the American hostages, Biden is crafting a pretext to assert unilateral decision-making authority, effectively overruling Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s strategic planning. This has been perceived as particularly galling given reports of Biden’s frequent and recent use of foul language (“the f-word”) in reference to Netanyahu, further straining the trust and cooperation essential for bilateral relations.

This approach has not only frustrated Israeli officials. It has stirred concerns among observers who see it as one in a series of steps by the Obama-puppet regime in Washington to undermine Israel’s sovereignty and its right to defend itself. The notion that the U.S. might negotiate independently with Hamas and other Arab actors, bypassing Israeli input, strikes many as a dangerous concession that could embolden terrorist groups and destabilize the region further.

Moreover, Biden’s strategy raises the specter of a broader U.S. retreat from supporting its allies’ right to self-defense, instead favoring diplomatic interventions that may not align with their security needs. Critics argue that this could set a precedent where U.S. interests, particularly concerning the safety of American citizens, dictate the terms of engagement in conflicts involving its allies, potentially at their detriment.

In a move that has further inflamed tensions, the Biden administration has issued a series of executive orders that have significant implications for Israel and its settlers in the West Bank. One such order imposes sanctions on individuals and entities involved in the settlement process, marking a stark departure from previous U.S. policies that were more lenient towards Israel’s settlement activities. This decision has been met with fierce backlash from Israeli officials and settlers, who view it as an unwarranted interference in Israel’s domestic affairs and a blow to the Jewish state’s sovereignty over its historical and biblical homeland.

Additionally, Biden has mandated that recipients of U.S. aid, including Israel, must submit and obtain approval for their humanitarian conduct, introducing a new layer of scrutiny that some critics argue could be used to exert undue pressure on Israel’s military operations and policies towards the Palestinians. This requirement has raised concerns about the potential for politicization of humanitarian aid and the imposition of American values and standards on sovereign nations.

Perhaps most controversially, there are reports that the Biden administration is preparing for the possible unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state. Such a move would represent a dramatic shift in U.S. policy and could have profound ramifications for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, potentially undermining Israel’s negotiating position and further complicating the path to a lasting peace agreement. Critics argue that this approach disregards the complexities of the conflict and the need for direct negotiations between the parties, instead favoring a solution that may not reflect the realities on the ground.

In essence, bumbling Biden’s ceasefire advocacy, under the guise of rescuing American hostages, is increasingly revealing itself, perhaps unintentionally, as a diplomatic gambit and a grand betrayal that risks Israel’s strategic interests and regional stability.