Last week’s congressional hearing on campus antisemitism, involving the presidents of Harvard, MIT, and the University of Pennsylvania, has not only highlighted the atrocious moral terpitude of these university leaders. It also has cast a disturbing spotlight on the broader issue of rising antisemitism in woke academic institutions and social circles generally.

The hearing saw University of Pennsylvania President Liz Magill, along with Harvard President Claudine Gay and MIT President Sally Kornbluth, being rigorously interrogated by Rep. Elise Stefanik over their handling of antisemitism on their campuses. A critical exchange involved Stefanik asking, “Does calling for the genocide of Jews violate Penn’s rules or code of conduct, yes or no?” to which Magill responded ambiguously, vaguely mumbling that the answer depended on the context​​​​ of the genocidal threat.

She was gone before a new week began. Gay would have her day Tuesday.

This incident is part of a disturbing trend of rising antisemitism in educational settings and public spaces. A Reuters survey reported that over 70% of Jewish college students in the U.S. were exposed to antisemitism this school year​​. At Ohio State University, two Jewish students were assaulted, and the campus Hillel was targeted, highlighting the severity of the situation​​. Furthermore, at the University of California, Berkeley, Jewish students were physically attacked for displaying Israeli flags, with the university initially not investigating these as hate crimes​​.

These incidents are not isolated to campuses but extend to the streets and public demonstrations, reflecting a surge in antisemitic violence and harassment. The rising tide of antisemitism necessitates a more robust response from university administrations and community leaders. Educational institutions must develop clear policies and take decisive actions against hate speech and violence, while law enforcement must ensure the safety and well-being of Jewish communities.

The responsibility lies not only with university presidents but also with broader society to address and counteract these deeply concerning trends. The need for moral clarity, decisive leadership, and an unwavering commitment to combating antisemitism is paramount in shaping a future where all individuals, regardless of their background or beliefs, can pursue education and live in a safe and respectful environment.

Magill’s resignation, influenced by the backlash from lawmakers, alumni, and the public, signifies a significant step in addressing the broader issue of antisemitism in higher education institutions. It reflects the mounting demand for university leaders to take a more assertive stance against such discrimination. As Rep. Stefanik commented on Magill’s resignation, it is seen as the “bare minimum of what is required,” calling for similar actions from Harvard and MIT. This unfolding scenario underscores the urgent need for educational leaders to proactively address and prevent antisemitism, ensuring a safe and inclusive environment for all students.