Israeli must take a Stoic and Merciless Stand Against the Amalek of Our Generation

Israeli’s indefatigable defeatists are it again, and perhaps never stopped. Using the untouchable families of the hostages as their human shields, parroting Hamas propaganda video slogans the hostages were forced to mouth, they blame Bibi (who else?) and demand, like our fondest enemies: CEASEFIRE NOW.

Ceasefires and hostage negotiations, often viewed as pathways to peace, of even the end of wars, can undermine the long-term goal of achieving a secure and stable region, especially when dealing with terror groups like Hamas. Agreeing to ceasefires or more hostage deals with Hamas could be seen, despite officials denials, as a tacit acknowledgment of their legitimacy and methods, emboldening them and other like-minded groups, and weakening Israel fatally.

A ceasefire can provide terrorist organizations with the opportunity to regroup, rearm, and strategize, negating previous gains made against them. History has shown that Hamas has used periods of reduced conflict to strengthen its military capabilities, making future confrontations more dangerous and prolonging the conflict. The restrained approach to Hamas, its care and feeding by feckless politicians (and not just Netanyahu), was to keep a ceasefire. By insisting on a ceasefire without achieving concrete steps towards disarmament or demilitarization, the cycle of violence would only continue, with greater risks, spiraling out of control.

Hostage negotiations set a dangerous precedent. Giving in to demands, particularly those involving prisoner releases or other concessions, incentivizes future kidnappings and acts of terror. Each successful negotiation for a terrorist organization is not only a tactical victory but also a propaganda tool, boosting their stature and appeal among potential recruits and sympathizers. Such negotiations can undermine the authority and legitimacy of governments and international bodies seeking a peaceful resolution. It sends a message that violent actions are a shortcut to achieve political aims, undermining international law and order, as we witness with disbelieving eyes at the debacle in the Hague.

The stated goal of the war, from the start, should be the disarmament and destruction of Hamas. The weak-kneed leftist, having been disillusioned, cling to NOW as their last resort. CEASEFIRE NOW. FREE HOSTAGES NOW. We need to ask: HOW NOW? How exactly does your endgame play out? We pity the families of the hostages but they have more hope than the families of those who were slaughtered on October 7 and the two hundred soldiers who have died since. Despite the PR, they are not worth more.

Ceasefires and hostage deals, while offering temporary relief, do not address the root of the problem. The international community, led by nations committed to combating terrorism, must work towards a permanent solution that ensures the safety and security of all people in the region. And if they don’t, and they try to put the Jewish State in the dock, and then the stock, and then the chopping block, what choice will Israel. We will fight. We won’t be cowards like the coerced or the crybabies who shriek NOW.

NOW what is needed is a firm, unwavering approach against Hamas and the other proxies. This stance not only protects those threatened by terrorism but lays the groundwork for a more stable and peaceful future for the region. The utter defeat and dismantling of genocidal terror organizations is a prerequisite.

The situation since the October 7 attack by Hamas, the deadliest against Israel since its establishment in 1948, has left deep and complex scars on the Israeli psyche. For the left, it is a grieving nation, a guilty nation, a crippled nation. An irreparable nation.

The scale of the tragedy, with 1,200 Israelis killed, surpasses any prior terrorist attack in Israeli history, since the Holocaust. This unprecedented loss of life has changed everything.

The heart-wrenching plight of the 136 hostages held by Hamas for over 100 days,the understandable anguish of their families, presents a profound moral and strategic dilemma. While empathy for the hostages and their families is natural and necessary, there’s a broader context that weighs heavily on the decision-making process. The Israeli government failed to safeguard its citizens’ lives and national security. The only, partial, redemption is win the war and eradicate Hamas. If that can be done while saving the hostage, that will be a miracle. If not, that will be the consequence of war with Amalek.

No cost is too high for preserving the only Jewish country. And the world should well understand that.

Thus, while there’s profound empathy for the hostages and their loved ones, the broader picture of national security and the need to prevent future attacks and hostage situations must remain paramount in shaping Israel’s stance and actions now. The heavy losses sustained by Israel in this war, and the brutal nature of Hamas’s tactics, reinforce the critical need for a strong, unwavering approach.

In 2011, Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit was released in exchange for more than 1,000 Palestinian prisoners. This exchange, while celebrated at the time for bringing a long-imprisoned soldier home, also demonstrated the potential consequences of releasing convicted terrorists. Many of these released terrorists returned to terrorist activities, including the Hamas leadership. The Shalit deal is proof positive of how merciful weakness can bolster terrorist groups and undermine efforts to achieve lasting peace.

It is evident that while the humanitarian pause in the current conflict was a necessary measure to address immediate concerns, an end or even a lightening of military action against Hamas at this juncture would be counterproductive, perceived as a sign of weakness and a victory for terrorist tactics, inevitably leading to more aggressive actions by Hamas and other terror groups in the future.

After more than 100 days of intense conflict, Israel has made significant progress in its military campaign against Hamas, yet a decisive victory remains elusive. Even the optimists in Israel admit it will take more months just to control Gaza, let alone Hezbollah in the north. This protracted battle underscores the complexities and challenges of confronting entrenched terrorist organizations funded from Iran. The hydra must be decapitated with every available weapon in Israel’s arsenal, the world be damned.

In the shadow of the ongoing hostage crisis with Hamas, Israelis are facing a heart-wrenching dilemma: the potential loss of hostages versus the broader imperative of national security. This situation calls for a stoic, unyielding stance, even if it means confronting the unbearable possibility of losing hostages. Even if it means many will be lost in a showdown with the Hamas leadership using them, along with their own civilian population, as human shields.

The call for stoicism stems from a broader understanding of the costs of conflict and the sacrifices already made. The Israeli public has endured significant losses, both civilian and military, in the persistent struggle against threats to their nation’s security. These losses include not just those who have fallen in battle but also victims of terrorism and other attacks. Each loss is a stark reminder of the high stakes involved in ensuring the nation’s safety and sovereignty.

Adopting a stoic attitude in the face of potential hostage losses is not about diminishing the value of individual lives. Instead, it’s about recognizing the harsh realities of the conflict with Hamas, where emotional responses and immediate concessions could lead to greater long-term risks. This perspective is informed by historical precedents, where concessions in hostage situations have sometimes led to emboldening terrorist groups, resulting in further violence and loss of life.

The Israeli public’s resolve in this situation reflects a deeper understanding that the lives of hostages, while precious, are part of a larger narrative of sacrifice and resilience. It acknowledges that the security of the state and its citizens is paramount and sometimes requires difficult decisions.

In conclusion, the stoic stance of Israelis in the face of the hostage crisis is rooted in a commitment to national security and the long-term safety of the nation. It’s a stance shaped by the recognition that the struggle against terrorism and for national security often demands tough, painful choices. This perspective values the collective well-being and future security of the nation, even at a high personal cost.

The stoic stance in the face of the ongoing hostage crisis with Hamas, while extremely challenging, can be aligned with certain Jewish traditions and principles. Jewish law, while emphasizing the great mitzvah of pidyon shevuyim (redeeming captives), also cautions against excessive ransoms. The Talmud in Gittin 45a states that captives should not be redeemed for more than their worth to avoid placing undue burdens on the community and to prevent future kidnappings. This was an original application of Tikkun Ha’olam (fixing of the world), reflects a broader concern for the safety of the entire Jewish community. It doesn’t mean favoring 100 families or a thousand over the existence and security of an entire nation.

The concept of “not being merciful to the cruel,” a principle derived from Jewish tradition, suggests that showing mercy to those who persistently engage in cruelty can lead to greater injustice and harm. Those of weak Jewish faith, more aligned with a socialism alien to true Jewish consciousness, see and feel the utter collapse of their own worldview. Even worse, they see in recent events the utter vindication of the perspective of religious Jews, especially those who walk the talk and move to the Jewish heartland.

The most pathetic scene in Israel is watching the media following the hostage families like lap dogs, even as they do ridiculous public relations stunts like going to the Gaza border with megaphones and speakers hoping that the hostages will hear them. They mock themselves, and insult our intelligence, if they think their antics will do anything other than raise the price for the hostages’ return.

Yes, ENOUGH. They are being used as tools by the Kaplanists and the reserve refusers, as well as the IDF 8200 and Intelligence commander who dismissed as hysteria the hostile intentions of Hamas. Either they were too arrogant or stupid to read the writing on the wall, or they preferred to let Bibi be bloodied and then blamed than alert him to the imminent threat.

Either way, the arrogant left-wing defeatists, reduced to spinning propellers, and the NGO-funded betrayers and former IDF and Shin Bet Brass who always know so much, THEY must pay the proportionate price.

There is now an epic struggle between the values of mercy and justice in this world, both divine attributes in Judaism. While mercy is essential, it must be balanced with the pursuit of justice, which sometimes requires hard decisions for the greater good​​. The Israeli public’s stoicism is not just a matter of national security policy but also a reflection of these deeply rooted Jewish values. Prioritizing the security and stability of the nation, even at the risk and cost of unbearable immediate loss, resonates with the sacred principles of balancing mercy with justice and preventing future harm. That’s what Israel needs NOW. Wanna cry?

ISRAEL WINS THIS WAR OR DIES AS A NATION. IS THAT NOT CLEAR YET?

YOU DON’T NEED A MEGAPHONE TO KNOW WHICH WAY THE WIND BLOWS.