|
S U K K O T    
by Rabbi Shlomo Riskin, Founder and Dean of
Ohr Torah Stone Institutions and Chief Rabbi of Efrat, Israel.
Efrat, Israel-- The festival of Sukkot is potentially one of the most
enjoyable, engaging and liberating of all of the Jewish holidays. What
can be more attractive than building and decorating a temporary "house" -
giving the entire family the fun project of constructing together a "home
away from home" which hosts such impressive and other-worldly
personalities as the Patriarchs, Joseph, Moses, Aaron and King David?
And then to enjoy a sleep-away in such an environment is a transporting
happening! The pity is that Sukkot falls only four days after the great
Yom Kippur fast, which is itself the culmination of a ten-day heavily and
heavenly burdened synagogue experience. We hardly have an adequate
opportunity to "get into" the Sukkot spirit - and activity - in a proper
manner. Why does the Jewish calendar have to be so crowded?!
Apparently, the connection between Sukkot and the prior High Holy-Day
period is not at all fortuitous, but is very much an intricate part of
the Divine design. And since we are commanded to properly inform the
future generations as to the significance of the sukkah (see Leviticus
23:43), it is important to examine in depth the connection between the
festivals.
The Talmud reports a fascinating difference of opinion as
to precisely what it is that the sukkah is commemorating: Rabbi Akiva
maintains that we are replicating the actual booths in which our
ancestors dwelt during their desert wanderings, while Rabbi Eliezer
believes that we are re-creating the miraculous "clouds of glory" which
descended from the Almighty as an ethereal protective shield when they
left Egypt [B.T. Sukkah 11b].
In addition to the obvious miraculous vs.
realistic interpretation of the sukkah symbol which is apparently the
major issue in this difference of opinion, I would like to suggest an
additional distinction - and a synthesis of both opinions.
Since
our tradition records that the final judgment and absolution of God
during this period of repentance is rendered on the seventh day of Sukkot
(Hoshana Rabba), it is clear that the sukkah is an intrinsic part of a
process which began with Rosh Hashanah. We may be waving the Four Species
during the day and sleeping in the sukkah at night, but what is really
going on here is repentance.
Hence, even when R. Eliezer and R. Akiva
disagree as to the identity of the "booths" themselves, perhaps they are
also distinguishing between two different aspects of the repentance
process.
Indeed, the Holy Zohar speaks of two forms of repentance: a lower
repentance (teshuvah tata'ah) which is for a specific transgression
or group of transgressions, and a higher repentance (teshuvah ila'ah)
which is an uplifting of the entire personality, a total ennobling of
one's direction in life. I would suggest that R. Akiva's sukkah,
reminiscent of the flimsy desert structures, is linked to the lower form
of repentance, and R. Eliezer's "clouds of glory" sukkah is linked to the
higher form of repentance. And ultimately we need both forms!
If we turn to Maimonides' codification concerning repentance, we find a
fascinating support for our hypothesis. Initially, Maimonides describes
the penitent as having to experience a humbling process: "The path of
repentance is for the penitent to cry out constantly before God with
tears and beseeching. He gives charity according to his ability,
distancing himself from what he did, and he changes his name as if to say
that he is not the same person who committed these transgressions,
transforming his deeds into righteous deeds. HE EXILES HIMSELF FROM HIS
PLACE, because exile serves as a forgiveness for sin in that it causes a
person to become more subdued, humble and subservient." [Laws of
Repentance, Ch. 2, Hal. 4]
Here we see an implicit connection between the last step in the repentance process
and the sukkah. Since no one understands the humbling experience better than a
person who has fallen so low that he must leave his accustomed abode, that he no longer
has a permanent roof over his head, the sukkah becomes in actuality the final step in
Maimonides' vision of repentance. And the entire desert
experience, with the Israelite wanderings from place to place, has served
as the historical paradigm of Jewish exile, according to most biblical
interpretations, with the sukkah standing out as the ultimate personalized
symbol of this exile.
Exile is punishment as well as forgiveness, with
the joy of the festival emanating from our relief in Divine absolution as
well as in the fact that "we have endured for close to 2000 years, and
the fragile sukkah has still not yet fallen in". [Yiddish folksong, "A
Sukkeleh"]
Yet several chapters ahead Maimonides codifies a different kind of repentance,
a state of perfection which places the penitent close to the Divine Presence:
"Repentance is on the highest level because it brings a person close to the Divine Presence. Yesterday
he was hated by God and alienated and abominable. But today he is beloved, delightful,
close, a beloved friend." [Laws of Repentance Ch. 7, Hal. 6] A friend of God! What a startling idea.
But Maimonides codifies that it is possible, and represents the highest achievement of
repentance. What do friends do? One way to express delight and closeness with
a beloved friend is to invite him into your home.
And in a sense, this is what happens on Sukkot. During Yom Kippur we were all in the presence of God - "lifnei Hashem" - like angels in heaven. But on Sukkot, which arrives only four days after Yom Kippur, our presence before God is extended by His making our home and His home the very same home. All through the months of Elul and Tishrei we add the 27th psalm to the prayer service
, which includes the following verse: One thing have I desired of the Lord ...that I may dwell in the house of the Lord all the days of my life... to see the sweetness of the Lord and to visit in His sanctuary." [Psalms 27:1]
Finally on Sukkot our desires are answered. In effect, God is the bridegroom, and we, the Jewish people, are the bride called upon to enter the bridegroom's home. The seven days we sit inside the sukkah correspond to the seven days that a marriage is celebrated . Since no 'Sheva Brachot' is complete without new faces at each of the seven festive meals, into our sukkah we also invite new faces for the duration of the seven days: Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, Aaron, Joseph and David, and the custom is called "ushpizin.'
Perhaps we must first seek forgiveness for our individual transgressions and
lovingly accept the exile of the sukkah of R. Akiva before we can enter
the marriage chamber of the glorious sukkah of R. Eliezer. How fortunate
are we that the one naturally turns into the other as we reach upwards in
our relationship to the Divine.
Chag Sameach
|